Towards Transparency

imageWithin the first 48 hours of clarifying its position on Bhopal via an e-mail press release, Dow-Chemical received messages from around 300 citizens, journalists, and shareholders. At DowEthics, we know how important it is to keep up the appearance of listening to our critics. Providing a platform by which you can publish your concerns is just one more way that we can take the proper time to act on them. That's why we're pleased to present some of the responses we've had, to help with our clarification efforts.

Note: The opinions expressed in these messages are those of the members of the public who wrote them. Dow does not necessarily share, and is in no way responsible for, or accountable to, the opinions of the public represented here, or elsewhere, now, in the past, or at any time in the future.


To: press@dow-chemical.com
Subject: Re: DOW ADDRESSES BHOPAL OUTRAGE, EXPLAINS POSITION

Wow Dow, Did you send me the above-referenced email, and if so why? The contents are an indictment of your company, and in no way absolve Dow nor justify Dow's position. The argument made is that the financial interests of corporations in general, and yours in particular take precedence over the suffering for which they are responsible. Instead of taking responsibity you offer this rationalization and call it "clarity"! May I suggest, if this email is genuine, that you save even more money and fire your PR department.


To: press@dow-chemical.com
Subject: Re: DOW ADDRESSES BHOPAL OUTRAGE, EXPLAINS POSITION

I must respond to your very strange and unsettling message!

> "Company responds to activist concerns with concrete action points"

There are no concrete action points here -- only paper-thin alibis.

>Dow Chemical (http://www.dow-chemical.com) has
> issued a statement explaining why it is unable to more actively
> address the problem.

You have NOT explained why you are unwilling to extend further compensation to the thousands upon thousands of people whose lives YOU HAVE DESTROYED through negligence. It's called impunity.

When you absorbed Union Carbide, you took on their liabilities -- and this is a fact you are still evading.

> "We are being portrayed as a heartless giant which doesn't care about
> the 20,000 lives lost due to Bhopal over the years," said Dow
> President and CEO Michael D. Parker. "But this just isn't true. Many
> individuals within Dow feel tremendous sorrow

"Sorrow" doesn't cut it. It's a cavalier way of stiffing the victims of Union Carbide's negligence. The terrible tragedies of Bhopal were caused by Union Carbide's willingness to risk a disaster to save a few pennies of operational cost...

> "Unfortunately, we have responsibilities to our shareholders and our
> industry colleagues that make action on Bhopal impossible. And being
> clear about this has been a very big step."

This is the most absurd statement I've ever read. You are blaming your own Stockholders and OTHER COS. for your irresponsible, callous, inhumane greed! Just when I thought corporate America couldn't sink any lower, you found a way!!!!!

> Although legal investigations have consistently pinpointed Union
> Carbide as culprit, both Union Carbide and Dow have had to publicly
> deny these findings.

Had to? What in the world are you talking about. You just stated Union Carbide was the source of the accident, and then you say you "had" to deny the findings? You are making no sense at all.

> "We understand the anger and hurt," said Dow Spokesperson Bob Questra.
> "But Dow does not and cannot acknowledge responsibility. If we did,
> not only would we be required to expend many billions of dollars on
> cleanup and compensation"

Obviously, a greater tragedy as far as you are concerned than the loss of life. Your attitude is that of a MASS MURDERER.

> "much worse, the public could then point to
> Dow as a precedent in other big cases. 'They took responsibility; why
> can't you?' Amoco, BP, Shell, and Exxon all have ongoing problems that
> would just get much worse.

That's not worse my friend, it's better. It's called corporate responsibility -- a concept that apparently you are too depraved to understand.... Aren't you kind? Looking out for other company's welfare.

> "We are unable to set this precedent for
> ourselves and the industry, much as we would like to see the issue
> resolved in a humane and satisfying way."

God, what humanists you are! Maybe you should share the Nobel prize with Netanyahu and Kissinger!


To: press@dow-chemical.com
Subject: Re: DOW ADDRESSES BHOPAL OUTRAGE, EXPLAINS POSITION

You and most corporations are poor excuses for human beings. Do you really consider $300 to 500. compensation for a person's life??? Why don't you admit you're at fault and do the right thing. I once owned Dow shares and I'm really glad I sold them years ago. Your loyalty to the other corporations is akin to the Mafia's loyality to its "family".


To: press@dow-chemical.com
Subject: Re: DOW ADDRESSES BHOPAL OUTRAGE, EXPLAINS POSITION

Referring to Dow Chemical as having a constructive part in the birth of the environmental movement is like crediting Hitler and Eichman's racial cleansing policies against the jews as having led to the origins of international ethical and moral judgements at Nuremberg. Or crediting cancer with the origins of chemotherapy. Your letter can only lead a normal person to question the reliability of the people running your corporation. Is it legal for a deranged and certifiably insane group of people to run a company selling stock to the public? By the way, a minor point, but when at the close of your letter, you refer to Dow's products as "solutions" for industry, you proudly include Agent Orange and DDT but forgot Napalm. As i recall that one added a significant amount of profit to those shareholders about whom you are so concerned.


To: press@dow-chemical.com
Subject: Re: DOW ADDRESSES BHOPAL OUTRAGE, EXPLAINS POSITION

Let me paraphrase your message: "For me (the murderer) to accept responsibility for my crime would be impossible, as it would mean I'd have to go to jail...I'd like to effectively admit guilt without paying the consequences."

This is total bullshit. In what kind of world can you actually try to pass off such a weak position as 'honest and clear'? $300-$500 per person??!!! Pay up some real money you cheap bastards!


To: press@dow-chemical.com
Subject: Re: DOW ADDRESSES BHOPAL OUTRAGE, EXPLAINS POSITION

Feeling responsibility and sorrow is just not the same as taking responsibiltiy for the actions of the company. May I suggest a hefty pay cut for executives and members of the board to help pay for the disaster. Perhaps Michael Parker could lead the way.


To: press@dow-chemical.com
Subject: the daily improvement of living

Brilliant! I love it. My life has improved simply by pointing and clicking on your website. Give me more!


To: press@dow-chemical.com
Subject: Re: DOW ADDRESSES BHOPAL OUTRAGE, EXPLAINS POSITION [!!!]

Gentlemen,

I find the response by the Dow Chemical Corporation not in the least satisfactory. There must be, and we will continue to insist upon, more satisfactory ways for the large corporations -- including their directors and managers -- to be held accountable for the consequences of their actions and installations. All of them. Otherwise 'bancruptcies' and other ploys will continue to be used as 'escape hatches' for corporate responsibility.

The use of the word "unfortunately" here and in most cases is deviously and insidiously misleading. What we are dealing with has nothing whatever to do with "fortune" or misfortune", good "luck" or bad "luck". What we are dealing with are human - "man-made" - provisions, constructions and situations which therefore need to be dealt with, and dealt to, by human action: socially, financially, and above all *politically*.

It is evidently and completely unfair, unjust, and reprehensible that *some* (few) people can reap huge rewards and high incomes, while (many) others are killed, injured, starved, and continue to live in miserable degraded conditions.

That 'situation' is not simply "unfortunate" --- it must and will be changed, by people, sooner or later, one way or another. Whoever does not see this is blind.


To: press@dow-chemical.com
Subject: Re: DOW ADDRESSES BHOPAL OUTRAGE, EXPLAINS POSITION

Dear Mr. Questra, Dow Spokesperson,

As a Dow retiree, and a Social Activist, a lot of correspondence has come across my desk that has made me either shake my head in disbelief or feel a huge sense of outrage, and in some cases both. So when I say that this bit of corporate spin is the most irresponsible, reprehensible, and nauseating piece of whitewashed corporate-speak that I have ever seen, I speak from truth. And it makes me ashamed of my long association with the company....


To: press@dow-chemical.com
Subject: Re: DOW ADDRESSES BHOPAL OUTRAGE, EXPLAINS POSITION

Dear Dow Press Office:

This is in response to Dow Chemical's statement explaining why it is unable to more actively address the problem of the tragedy in Bhopal.

When corporations were given personhood in the early nineteenth century by the U.S. Supreme Court, it was not envisioned that such personhood gave only the benefits but none of the responsibilities of personhood.

Bhopal was ruined by the destruction of a chemical plant, and responsibility lies with the corporation who was benefitting from it OR its successors.


To: press@dow-chemical.com
Subject: Rachel Carson's Silent Spring

For Dow to take "credit" for poisoning the planet with DDT, and thereby to take credit for Rachel Carson's alerting the world to your company's poison represents a new low in corporate ethics.

Combining this with the thoroughly amoral statements of your CEO on why Dow cannot acknowledge responsibility for Union Carbide's legacy at Bhopalmakes Dow Chemical a blight on the hope that corporations can act ethically and morally even if it has an adverse effect on profits.

If you compare Dow's behavior with that of Johnson & Johnson when some of it's McNeil Division's Tylenol was poisoned by a criminal, you would find that corporations can remain profitable, even highly profitable, in the long run by sacrificing short term profit for moral and ethical reasons.

Incidentally, Rachel Carson died in 1964 after authoring Silent Spring in 1962, not 1969 as your web site states.

Would you be kind enough to remove this disgusting paragraph from the home page of your web site?

Thanks for allowing me this opportunity to communicate with you.


To: press@dow-chemical.com
Subject: Re: DOW ADDRESSES BHOPAL OUTRAGE, EXPLAINS POSITION

Is this supposed to make me feel BETTER??? Or is this some mentally-deranged person's idea of a joke???

You people are HORRIBLE!!! and your position is illogical, to boot.

You are saying that you (SOME of you) care, but it's just not convenient to do anything about it.

These are human LIVES we are talking about. Impoverished people, sick people (and their sickness caused BY YOUR CHEMICALS)

You are saying that MONEY is more important than PEOPLE.

You are saying that shareholders are more important than the innocent people you killed, maimed and sickened.

Right is right. If you made the mess, it IS your job to clean it up. Most of us learn this in kindergarten. It's part of the GOlden Rule. Or do you have different rules you play by (apparently!), and if so, who gave you the right to decide when you would and would not take responsibility for what YOU (and no one else) DID?!?!?!

I am shocked, appalled, horrified, sickened and disgusted with you. I guess "corporate responsibility" is the biggest oxymoron of them all. Rest assured, you will never receive a dime from me as a customer. I will make sure I boycott any company that has any connection to yours.

Some time ago I had a debate with a friend about whether or not "evil" exists.

I took the side that it doesn't. People are just misguided, I said.

Well, I take it back.

You are EVIL INCARNATE!!!!!!


To: press@dow-chemical.com
Subject: Bhophal disaster

To Michael Parker, President:

The statement issued recently regarding Dow's lack of willingness to take responsibility for what happened at Bhopal declares that your stockholders and the business you are in makes this impossible. Profiting richly from the cover-up of your culpability in the miserable and painful deaths of some 20,000 poor and humble people is clearly, however, not beyond the capacity of Dow and its subsidiary Union Carbide. Could there be any clearer demonstration of the venality and cruelty of Capitalism? I think not.

The world, however, is full of people who unlike you, have not lost their moral compass. There is a growing tide of righteous anger building toward people like you, your board of directors and your stockholders. A day of reckoning will one day come. Meanwhile, if you have any gods I suggest you pray for your immortal soul. This may comfort you. But if you, like me, are guided only by my own sense of right and wrong, may you never have a good night's sleep or moment of personal peace or happiness until you make things right with the people of Bhopal.

Have you no sense of decency?


To: press@dow-chemical.com
Subject: Re: DOW ADDRESSES BHOPAL OUTRAGE, EXPLAINS POSITION

I guess that the almighty dollar is more important than human lives. Yes, Dow is a heartless giant that does not care about people. Shareholder value > moral responsibility. Shame on you......


To: press@dow-chemical.com
Subject: Bhopal

Hi,

I'm actually a shareholder of Dow Chemical anddon'tagree with your position that your responsibility is strictly to your shareholders. I

feel that corporations have a civic and moral responsibility as well. Let's be honest. If it hadn't happened in a third-world country, such as India, this issue wouldn't have been so "inexpensively" dealt with and so easily swept under the rug. Dow Chemical ismerely justifying its decision on no other grounds than the obvious fact that ducking the issue works in your favor.


To: press@dow-chemical.com
Subject: Re: DOW ADDRESSES BHOPAL OUTRAGE, EXPLAINS POSITION

Thanks for the press release. It must be difficult to work for a company that you know does harm to the world in general and then have to lie to the world about it. Do you really want to look back at your life and realize that you spent so many years telling lies for a lousy corporation that will axe you in a millisecond as soon as the profits deem it necessary? Have a nice sleep tonite.


To: press@dow-chemical.com
Subject: BHOPAL OUTRAGE, "We did it, but won't pay! Haha!"

I'm confused. Didn't you just admit responsibility? Or did you say, "Yes, we did it, but since it would 1) cost too much and 2) make other companies pay for their disasters we refuse to admit we did it"

WHAT!? You did it. It's your fault. Your shareholders are not more important than your VICTIMS.

If you hoped this half-admission would satisfy us , you're foolish beyond belief. Your excuses just make me angry. YOU ADMIT GUILT, BUT REFUSE TO TAKE THE BLAME.

"Yes, I murdered this man (or thousands of men) but I can't go to jail or it would cost someone else money" You're WORSE THAN ENRON, and you will pay the way they will.

I hope every shareholder looks in their heart and SELLS THEIR STOCK. Your employees shouldn't suffer-- take the money out of your CEO's retirement fund. Sell your VPs' company cars. You make me sick. This press release just makes things worse.

Thanks for an embarrassingly pathetic attempt to shut us up. Good luck to your press secretary- you'll need it!


To: press@dow-chemical.com
Subject: Re: DOW ADDRESSES BHOPAL OUTRAGE, EXPLAINS POSITION

I find your attempt at self-justification to be pretty pathetic. You can't take responsibility because then you would actually have to pay for the mess you made? And because then other corporations that make messes and kill people and destroy the environment might potentially have to take responsibility as well? Please forgive me if I can't muster up any sympathy for your so-called moral dilemma. I don't see why basically saying, "Sorry, but tough shit" amounts to a "very big step."


To: press@dow-chemical.com
Subject: Re: DOW ADDRESSES BHOPAL OUTRAGE, EXPLAINS POSITION

You really make a body sick, over our morning cup of coffee, with your excuses for not making an effort to do something about the poor people of India's plight. Your company should feel some responsibility to the 20,000 people of India as well as the sweet smell of success of your "agent orange" that has brought such joy to this country's vets and to the rest of the world.


To: press@dow-chemical.com
Subject: Re: DOW ADDRESSES BHOPAL OUTRAGE, EXPLAINS POSITION

from your website:

"To work with others to put in proper perspective past handling and disposal practices by companies we had nothing to do with at the time, such as Union Carbide's responsibility for the death of 20,000 people and serious injury of 120,000 in a chemical accident somewhere in India."

this is disgraceful. "somewhere in India?" Couldn't you even be bothered to type Bhopal? Together with today's revelations that you are blatantly putting shareholders interests over those of the Indian people whose lives you destroyed - I am not surprised, but still disgusted. I really hope this is picked up by the press, your company is gived all the shaming publicity it deserves, and your precious share price plummets.


To: press@dow-chemical.com
Subject: Re: DOW ADDRESSES BHOPAL OUTRAGE, EXPLAINS POSITION

So your shareholders and industry colleagues are more important that the lives of 20,000 people and the families they left behind? Profits ahead of human lives.... You should be ashamed of yourselves. And to the individual who reads this--how can you live with yourself, trying to justify such a crime? For shame!!! From napalm in Vietnam to pesticide in Bhopal -- Dow continues to poison our world with its chemicals...

line1 line2
 | 
white space line3
Copyright © The Dow Company
(1995-2002). All Rights Reserved.